Submission‎ > ‎

Reviewing Process

The manuscript submissions is encouraged to be submitted electronically at the Bepress web site. All submissions must conform to the submission instructions given on the Bluebook Citation. 
Submissions will be evaluated on the basis of originality, contribution, soundness, evaluation, quality of presentation and appropriate comparison to related work. For the technical research track, we invite high quality submissions of papers describing original and unpublished results of conceptual, constructive, empirical, experimental, or theoretical work in all areas of international and comparative legal studies. Successful submissions may range from novel technical results to scientific evaluations of existing problems or research results. Submissions describing groundbreaking approaches to emerging problems will be considered based on timeliness and potential impact. Submissions will be evaluated on the basis of originality, contribution, soundness, evaluation, quality of presentation, and appropriate comparison to related work. 

The first level of review is carried out by a member of the editorial committee who have expertise in relevant subject and current research areas. The second level of review is performed by the Chair of Editorial Boards. Only applications that are favorably recommended by both the editorial committee and the Chair may be recommended for review by the external reviewers, usually two to four, with the relevant expertise or current research area. In addition, the reviewing process is also involving the active role of the relevant members of advisory committee at any stage whenever it deems as appropriate. Please also note that sometimes authors are encouraged to suggest possible external reviewers. The editor of the journal receives the manuscripts with comments back from the expert reviewer(s) and forwards them to the author with a summary recommendation. There are generally four different types of recommendations: (1) publication as is; (2) needs revision to correct errors or answer certain questions; (3) does not fit the focus of the journal or (4) not suitable for publication. Should you have any further questions regarding this process, please contact us at: